Archive for November, 2012
Shamelessly commercial but still a thrill to my little girl and to little boys and girls everywhere. Enjoy!
There is an old saying that’s been running through my mind quite a bit these days: “What is good for the goose is good for the gander.”
Alas, alas…some seem to disagree.
For the past decade American teachers have been in the cross hairs of the most well financed, relentless, and hydra-headed public relations campaign against a legal profession in our history. Nothing else even comes close. Indeed, I can think of no other formally respected profession ever so targeted. Anywhere. At any time. This campaign, which masquerades as a movement, was created by and is bankrolled by the richest individuals in the nation and backed by some of the most powerful political figures in the land under the rubric of education reform. Most prominent in the former category are Bill Gates, the Walton family, Eli Broad and any number of hedge fund managers such as instant education expert Whitney Tilson, founder of the egregious Democrats for Education Reform (DFER). Prominent in the latter category are Jeb Bush, Andrew Cuomo, Rahm Emmanuel and Barack Obama. Despite such powerful figures, the campaign likes to present itself not merely as a movement but as a grass roots movement, spontaneously erupting like a long simmering volcano, it’s gases escaping from the magma chambers of the American educational earth.
The campaign is masterful at the creation and propagation of demands and the dissemination of lies, deceptions and false accusations. Central to the campaign is the idea of teacher accountability. Indeed, the campaigners want to hold teachers accountable for their student “a performance”, a performance measured in large part by highly unreliable high stakes tests.
What follows are a few of their most insidious and blatantly false claims:
Poverty is an excuse and is no obstacle to student achievement.
Tenure guarantees a teacher a job for life.
Standardized tests are true indicators of a quality education and quality teachers.
The real problem with schools is that selfish teachers and their thuggish unions are forever putting their interests over the children they are charged to serve.
Of all the lies hurled at teachers ad infinitum, none is more repugnant and underhanded than the last and none gets more mileage by the messianic corporate reformers. It carries within it, albeit in embryonic form, the zero sum ideology of corporate education reform: it is somehow impossible to reach an accord in which both teacher and student are treated fairly and with dignity. For these folks, one side must dominate the other. That’s simply how life is, you see.
(The fact that the charge of teacher selfishness emanates from billionaires and hedge-fund managers is completely congruent with the surreal nature of the entire corporate education campaign in which the least knowledgeable and experienced are somehow, mystically, the most qualified, the most insightful as well as the most concerned. )
This particular lie has been perhaps most effectively (because unconsciously) propagated in the very names of any number of reform organizations: names that in many ways serve as accusations in and of themselves. What conclusion can one draw from an organization that calls itself Children First Network ? Or Students First. Org ? Or Stand For Children ? What conclusion other than someone ( psssssssss… hint: teachers ) or something ( psssssssss… hint: teacher’s unions ) out there is putting these poor kids last ?
Then there is the masterful motto of the New York City Department of Education: “ Children First. Always.”
Except, it seems, when tending to the needs of corporations like Pearson and their (equally misleadingly named ) Common Core State Standards, currently being presented to the nation as the panacea to all that ails American education.
Not to mention the millions of dollars to be made in the production and sale of Common Core based tests, Common Core Text books, Common Core guides, and Common Core learning aids and accessories of every conceivable (and inconceivable) kind.
But there is a problem in paradise.
Somehow in the frenzied production of all these Common Core based paraphernalia, both city and state failed to insure the production of the element most essential to the possibility of the Common Core having any kind of real educational success. Somehow both city and state failed to produce a curriculum. It is difficult to overestimate how grand a failure this is.
Imagine, for example, someone trying to sell you a car with a speedometer but no engine.
In the place of a curriculum, New York City and New York State have offered teachers and administrators the Common Core Standards and sample “bundles”, implying that said standards, said “bundles,” and curriculum are more or less the same thing, an error that no one even vaguely knowledgeable in or concerned with education would ever make, not to mention those determined to “put kids first.”
This is, of course, one of the many problems with allowing people with little no educational experience — think Bill Gates, Arne Duncan, Dennis Walcott — to completely remake an education system.
But, in typical fashion, it has become the problem, not of those who created it but those who must deal with it. That is to say, teachers. For New York City and New York State, the solution to their failure to provide curriculum for their teachers is to have teachers write curriculum. No matter that it is not the responsibility of teachers to write curriculum. (Teachers are meant to write lesson plans from curriculum not lesson plans and curriculum. ) No matter that most teachers most have no idea of how to write curriculum. No matter that teachers are not contractually obliged to write curriculum. (The issue is now in arbitration at the New York State Public Employment Relations Board (PERB.) No matter that teachers have never even seen the test that they are to somehow, magically, write curriculum to prepare their student for. So what if 17,00 New York City schools produce 17,00 different curricula, hodge-podged together by people who have no business doing anything but teaching. So what if the third to eighth grade tests administered in March will be up to two grade levels more difficult than anything the students or their teachers have ever seen before.
So what that the New York State Department of Education knowingly decided that millions of children will be forced to take Common Core based high stakes tests of which many haven’t a prayer of passing. So what if this unconscionable incompetence leads directly to demoralizing millions of kids. So what if the same test scores are used to evaluate teachers, principals, and schools and may be used to terminate the former and close the latter.
The imperative, it seems clear, is to ram the unproven, untested, unknown entity called Common Core State Standards into the very center of the educational lives of these kids and their teachers as fast as possible, ready or not. Now. Before it’s too late. There’s not a moment to spare.
Let the chips fall where they may.
After all, hasn’t Arne Duncan spent the last four years criss-crossing the country enlightening all to the notion that “education is the civil rights issue of our time?” Didn’t Condoleezza Rice declare at the Republican National Convention that education is now a matter of national security?
Seen in those glaring lights, the absence of a curriculem seems almost petty.
On the other hand, on what planet can this kind of educational malfeasance be considered “putting children first?” And what about that tricky issue of accountability? Who is responsible for this ? How is it possible that a screw –up of this magnitude is allowed to go by not merely without heads rolling, but without barely a peep in the press? Where are the hedge funders weeping copious tears for the poor children now? Where are the apostles of accountability with this travesty?
The larger question, of course, is what is the priority here? It is kids or corporations? Is it to help make kids “college or career ready” so as to compete in the ever more savage global economy? Or is it to shovel millions of taxpayer dollars to Pearson and associates on Common Core accessories before most people even know what Common Core is?
“ We’ve been working really hard around Common Core, said Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott, whose educational experience consists of one year teaching kindergarten. “We’ve been really light years ahead of the rest of the state in terms of the implementation of Common Core but at the same time, we’re ready for the new curriculum to be put in place as well.” Asked when that might be, Walcott replied, “I don’t know. I’ll let you know.” That was last month.
So much for putting children first. So much for accountability.
By way of excusing the inevitable results of this farce, Walcott added: “We’ve said that we expect scores to go down. We just don’t know to what level. I mean, this is going to be a tough, tough test.”
I’ll say. And it’s hard cheese, old chap!
State Education Commissioner John King (whose educational experience consists of teaching for three years) at least provided an answer if a completely unacceptable one. The curriculum will be ready “by Fall, winter 2013, said King.
Why is the media not all over this? Where are all those concerned faces found on Education Nation? Why is this not considered a major scandal by all of those pundits forever gasbagging about selfish unions and the holy efficiency of the business world ?
The absence of criticism is understandable but not excusable. It is understandable because both the people running the school system and those commenting on those running the school system have no idea what they are talking about and could easily believe a standard is a curriculum. Why wouldn’t they? Many seem to believe that closing down schools and mass firings of teachers are somehow great accomplishments.
My fear, bordering on absolute certainty, is that no matter what the real pedagogical value of the Common Core actually is, it will be declared a success. Indeed, it has already been declared so. Unique among federal impositions, contrary to common sense or common decency, there has been no attempt to field-test the Common Core. It is assumed ready to go on arrival. Even, apparently, without a curriculum.
What we are witnessing here is the slow motion creation of a system that is built to be too big to fail. It is built to be too big to fail because there is simply too much money to be made in its implementation. Millions and millions on tests alone. It will generate more tests than have ever been seen before on planet earth. That is not hyperbole. Because of Common Core, writes Diane Ravitch, “Our children shall eat, live and breathe tests, from birth to the end of their education.”
If nothing else the Common Core is a virtual industry on a scale hitherto unknown in American education. We have seen this before, of course in other fields. We have seen it with Goldman Sachs or Fannie Mae or any number of colossi, too big to fail operations that failed anyway and almost brought the entire world down with them. We have just never seen this kind of thing in education before. But then, ours is a time in which there are many, many things we have never seen in education before.
As I write the Common Core is being used to lead children to slaughter. Right behind them are the reputations of teachers and principals and entire schools. If you wish to see the abject contempt in which corporate reformers and their employees in elected office hold our children and our families look no further. If you wish to see children being put very far behind immense corporate profits, look here. If you want to see the opposite of accountability, you’ve come to the right place.
It is a place where what is good for the goose is very, very good indeed for this goose is a very, very golden goose.
And never you mind the gander.
I was raised in a large working class family sustained by the wages my father earned as a member of a union ( and later as a union leader) in an industry that has all but gone the way of the pterodactyl. So it goes. But at the time, on his modest salary, he was able to keep eleven of us not only clothed and fed, but enrolled in Catholic schools and eventually living in our own house. All this on a single salary. All this utterly unthinkable in our day. Why ? What happened ? Ours was a home in which the ghosts of Governor Al Smith, FDR and the Kennedy brothers were almost corporeal beings and the Democratic Party, as imperfect as any human organization, was the unambiguous and proud champion of our class, the working class. In the world in which I grew up, if you were not rich, you would have been thought mentally ill to vote for the Republican Party.
And I do not recall ever hearing talk of “the lesser of two evils” and you can rest assured, I was listening.
This, of course, was before the advent of the worst aspects of American liberalism, the endless divisiveness of identity politics, the astounding and abiding success of political hucksters like Bill Clinton, the passing of NAFTA, the off-shoring of the American manufacturing base, the relentless undermining of unions, the repeal of Glass-Steagall and the advent of financialization: all of these which collectively comprised the wholesale betrayal of the American working class. All of which were aided and abetted, when not outright championed, by the Democratic Party.
I write this not as an exercise in useless nostalgia but as a context for my refusal to insult myself by casting a vote for a party that has not merely long ago ceased to represent the likes of myself (in point of fact, outside of corporations I do not know exactly who the Democratic Party does represent ) but has, in many ways, degenerated into an active enemy. This is most true in the Democratic stand on labor. It has left millions and millions stranded. Which is exactly where they want us to be. Their tacit question: Where are you going to go ? To the Republicans ? To the Tea Party ? And this pathetic trap has been set largely by the successful exploitation of the politics of fear and playing the card of the lesser of two evils again and again and again.
So here it is, Election Day and I’m facing the same hand I’ve been dealt for virtually my entire adult life. But today there is a difference, a logical and inevitable difference: as the corporate state has consolidated itself within both parties and, outside of “trigger” issues such as gay marriage and abortion, the two parties major political positions have become more and more alike, the lesser of two evils has in many cases become merely the slower of two evils. This is the only way I can view the choice of Mr. Obama or Mr. Romney.
I have not the time to discuss my disgust with President Obama’s policy of murder by drone, his refusal to prosecute either the people who brought the world economy to the brink of disaster or the war criminals of the Bush administrations, his failure to close Guantanamo or his belief that he has the right to order the assassination of anyone on earth, among other things. Nor have I any doubt that Mitt Romney would be as bad or worse on any of the above. Rather I wish to argue that both men wish to lead the nation to the same end using slightly different means. And that end is the complete domination of the corporate state.
Consider that Barack Obama and Mitt Romney traffic exclusively in platitudes, are complete and committed corporatists and are, as such, owned, lock, stock and barrel. Which is not to say there are not differences between the two. Romney is far more obvious and forthright about his allegiance. When Romney declared that “Corporations are people too, my friends”, he meant it and he doesn’t seem to care who knows it.
Obama, meanwhile, is infinitely more of a stealth promoter of the corporate state: he wants it in there before you notice and seems very concerned with establishing some similitude of public consent and, short of that, someone else’s fingerprints, preferably yours, on his schemes. Obama wants you to like him as he debases your existence and tries to enlist you in your debasement. In other words, he wants political cover and some version of plausible deniability — even when he is in complete agreement with what he is ostensibly opposing.
Romney, on the other hand, seems content just to smile his howdy doody smile and talk about how wonderful Americans are by virtue of their being American. God, you understand, loves us more than other people. And who can blame him ?
Consider Barack Obama’s and Mitt Romney’s approach to education, the issue that ,as one of 3.2. million public school teachers and a father of a public school student, is nearest and dearest to my heart.
Both Obama and Romney are tireless champions of what is euphemistically called “education reform”; what is, in fact, a relentless bi-partisan billionaire backed campaign to privatize the public school system while busting or rendering ornamental the teachers’ union, the last large union standing in our country. And note well that neither candidate would allow their own children anywhere near a school implementing their reforms. And for excellent reason.
Romney’s plan is as simple and transparent as Romney himself: eradicate the federal Department of Education and give vouchers to every family in the continental USA. And smile idiotically while doing so.
Presto! The hidden hand of the magical free market will be eradicating “the achievement gap ” and passing out diplomas before you can say “Wall Street!” The same (even more) hidden hand will also be handing out pink slips to most if not all of the 3.2 million teachers who will in turn implode their union.
Bingo! Two birds with one stone !
Now think about Obama’s signature educational initiative, Race To the Top. The name alone billboards Obama’s complete alignment with corporate ideology. Races, as you know, have winners and losers. Public institutions should not. That goes double for schools. In point of fact, despite the incoherent, indefensible claims of both American Federation of Teacher’s president Randi Weingarten and National Education Association president Dennis Van Roekel that Obama is somehow a pro-public education president, RTTT is designed to simultaneously undermine both the public school system and the teachers unions and usher in the complete privatization of the public school system on a national level. Slowly. And with political cover. You see, they will claim, we tried. Public schools simply don’t work and so we must let corporations run them. Sorry.
Whereas Romney wishes to do away with public schools with a couple of swift death blows, the kinder gentler Obama wishes to asphyxiate it over time with a number of objectively unfair and unscientific schemes, all having to do with standardized tests, all products of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, those deeply concerned private citizens who make public policy for your child and mine. Obama wants teachers and teachers unions to assist him by committing slow collective suicide while perhaps allowing a few here and there to maintain their jobs.
Fours years into the works RTTT is incrementally succeeding at all of these goals accompanied by the startling spectacle of union teachers praising the president and rallying for the reelection of the man who is actively and consciously destroying their workplaces, threatening their livelihoods and force feeding a lousy paint-by-numbers pseudo education on the nation’s children but not Obama’s and his friends.
Many teachers are doing this because the other guy, Romney, is even worse. This is undoubtedly true. Romney is a nightmare. But so is Obama. And so is this scenario. And so is this country. These are the choices of caged animals, not free human beings. And this nightmare will remain and, in fact, grow more so if we do not cease accepting the pathetic and grotesque choices we are given, do not cease accepting the cynical trap that has been set for us do not cease accepting that this is just the way it is.
Education is one issue, to be sure. But to be just as sure, it is emblematic of how the man and the Democratic party now operate. Look at them. Andrew Cuomo is a Democrat. Rahm Emanuel is a Democrat. Bill Gates is a Democrat. So is every member of the hedge fund gang who created and bankroll Democrats For Education Reform. They are also, like our beloved president, insidious union busters.
So welcome to your plutocracy. Welcome to the almost completed corporate state. Welcome to the ever-shrinking farce of political choice. Welcome to the lesser of two evils where inevitably there is more and more evil all the time. How can there not be ? What and who is there to stop it ? You will forgive me or you won’t for my outright refusal to vote for a president who has made no secret of his outright contempt for working people, labor unions, the poor, due process of the law and habeas corpus because he knows he can get away with it because he know you know his opponent is even a greater a danger than he.
This is not the position of a free people. To accept this is to abdicate one’s intellectual, spiritual and civic responsibility. It is to surrender one rights. It is to accept and legitimize powerlessness as call such powerlessness freedom.
I am a human being who believes, body and soul, in participatory democracy, attempting to be as free as I can be. Therefore I am voting for Jill Stein and the Green Party.