It was with deep and increasing sadness that I read the steady stream of emails coming in real time from my colleagues attending New York State Commissioner of Education’s John King’s Common Core “listening tour” which set up base in Brooklyn last night. The sadness did not stem from the fact that my colleagues were essentially silenced by a calculated maneuver by Michelle Rhee’s Student First NY organization to ensure no voice but theirs was heard by bussing people in early in order to gobble up all of the speaking slots, even as they reportedly repeated the same lines over and over again.
I expect such anti democratic machinations from all corporate education reform front groups, that much the more from anything associated with a ruthless monster like Rhee. What saddened me was the conscious injection of race into what us is ostensibly meant to be an airing of pedagogical policy. The line of thinking I read about again and again and again was that if you opposed the Common Core Standards – presented somehow as a matter not of pedagogy but of civil rights — it was because you are a racist and you did not want children of color to succeed in school.
That’s it.
This is very, very ugly and purposely divisive stuff. Indeed, it could scarcely get uglier or more divisive.
But in a way it makes sense: an ugly, brutal and suicidal sense but sense anyway. It is a kind of toxic combination of cynicism and desperate hope, one in which you have the city systemically starving schools in impoverished and minority neighborhoods and the predatory cunning of the corporate education reformers of which Common Core is a crown jewel preying off of that poverty.
For when you ram into existence, by some of the most insidious and antidemocratic processes possible, a billionaire backed experiment on the children of an entire nation; an experiment created by some of the most arrogant and ruthless souls on earth (Bill Gates, David Coleman); an experiment based on nothing but endlessly repeated rhetoric and slogans (“making kids college and career ready”) and one that that has been greeted by parents and teachers alike with incomprehension and disgust, you would do well to have evidence of the amazing success you claim such an experiment brings.
But since the creators of the Common Core — in an act of unprecedented and unconscionable hubris — did not even bother to field-test the thing, there is no evidence to be had of anything anywhere.
So what do you do when people start asking questions? How can you defend the indefensible? How do you support something with no evidence to support it with?
You can’t.
But you can try to change the argument. Ergo: the problem with the Common Core is not with the Common Core (which is perfect at conception) but with anyone and everyone who opposes it for any reason, no matter how sound. According to the New York Times, people oppose the Common Core is because they are Tea Party nut jobs or left wing conspiracy nut jobs. Or because they want teachers to coddle their kids. According to Arne Duncan opposition stems from the fact that suburban moms just can’t handle the reality that their kids are dumb and their schools sucks as badly as they really do.
All of this is ugly but it also silly. To introduce the element of race into this discussion in a nation where racism has been its most disgusting and perhaps most permanent reality is anything but silly.
Such a move is meant not to promote dialogue but to end it. No decent person wants to be called a racist or to be accused of promoting racist policies, which is what many at last night’s “forum “ apparently claimed opponents of the Common Core are doing. This line of thinking has no more credibility that those of Arne Duncan or Joe Bruni or Bill Keller and it should be given no more credibility. What is credible and what must be heard is the very real anguish and near despair that produced such thinking. It did not come out of nowhere.
In a few hours John King will hold another “forum” in downtown Manhattan.
I have no idea if Students First NY or some other billionaire backed front group will attempt to pull a similar stunt but this time around I will be in attendance, as will many of my friends and colleagues and I hope to speak to the issue at hand and not be drowned out by confusion and ugly corporate sponsored obfuscation.
December 15, 2013 at 5:20 pm
On the bright side, you should all
know that it’s possible for an E4E teacher
to “wake up,” quit, and take a public stand
against this group… or E4E’s ally, Students First.
Case in point: a long-time, Los Angeles
Educators for Excellence (E4E) teacher
and supporter, Lisa Alva Wood, has
written a blistering article detailing
how and why she has broken with E4E and
other such groups after waking up
to their true intent, and the true intent
of their backers:
In an eavesdropping moment,
Lisa listened in on a “corporate reform”
conference call that was originally
supposed to be about one topic,
but the news of corporate reform-backed
LAUSD Superintendent John Deasy’s possible
resignation changed the purpose of the
conference call.
This caused Lisa to freeze up and not answer
the conference call’s “roll call.” Thus,
the rest of the corporate reform
astroturf participants were unaware that an
actual union (UTLA) teacher was on the line (albeit
one who also belonged to E4E, as back then she
attempted to keep ties to both UTLA and
corporate reform groups.) What Lisa then
heard finally got her to “wake up” to
the truth about E4E and other such
groups, and write the article linked
to above.
However, I just was poking around
on E4E’s site, and a video of Ms. Alva
Wood gushing about E4E is still there:
http://www.educators4excellence.org/multimedia/video?video_id=26
It’s also still on YouTube:
http://www.educators4excellence.org/multimedia/video?video_id=26
I’m familiar with Ms. Alva Wood, having spoken with
her before her defection where I attempted to enlighten
her about E4E. She was in denial, and wouldn’t
accept anything I was telling her, saying that she
could participate in all groups—UTLA, and
the corporate reform astroturf orgs (E4E, TeachPlus, Teachers for New Unionism, etc.)… and
help the cause of education and teachers.
Well, now we all know how well THAT turned out.
Thankfully, that contradiction just
came to a head, and she’s
cutting all her ties with corporate
reform (except for her participation
in a holiday educator-recognition
event sponsored by United Way,
which will be the last thing
she will do with this group.)
Lisa goes into detail about
“Road to Damascus” conversion
experience, and how it
happened during the “corporate
reform” astroturfers’ conference
call that planned the
demonstrations to save Deasy
that are described by Ellen Lubic
in another blog post:
Here Ellen describes the astroturf
rally that this conference call led to.
This pro-Deasy Rally was a grotesque
circus that played out much the same
as the first Common Core “public forum”
that was held in Manhattan:
dianeravitch.net/2013/12/06/ellen-lubic-corrects-ben-austin/
Here’s Lisa describing the call
as a reason for her quitting:
– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –
LISA ALVA WOOD:
“I QUIT. I had to.
“Hopefully, you’ve never picked up
the telephone and felt the hair
stand up on the back of your neck
as you realized who was on the
phone and what they were talking
about, felt your heart empty out
and felt dread and despair flooding
in.
“I have, twice.
“The first time, it was my ex-husband.
“The second time, it was the United
Way of Los Angeles. I phoned into
a conference call that wasn’t what I
expected, and it ended my
relationships with the Partnership for
Los Angeles Schools, Teachers for
a New Unionism and Educators for
Excellence, and put some others
in the doghouse.
” … ”
“All of this (the LAUSD Ipad fiasco) is
chronicled in the press, but I mention
it to set the stage for a little feint that
John Deasy pulled on October 24,
2013, right after the I-Pad scandal and
right before he was going to be called
in for his own job evaluation.
“It was the last straw. Although I
had publicly stuck up for him after
a UTLA poll of 16,000 educators
rendered a 91% ‘no confidence’
vote, I lost all faith in him with the
iPad situation, and had to face
some very hard realities about
reform groups in LA.
“The call confirmed some of the
most discouraging talk I’d heard
or read, and some of my most
disappointing experiences. After what
I heard, I couldn’t stay any longer.”
– – – – – – – – – – – –
The conference call Lisa described
was originally supposed to be a
discussion about Local
Control Funding, but instead
was about “Saving Dr. Deasy:
– – – – – – – – – –
LISA ALVA WOOD:
“When I called in, I heard a roll call
of 51 educational, community or
political groups whose sole
purpose on the call was to support
John Deasy in his fight to keep his
job.
“The news that Deasy was
threatening to quit had changed
the topic and galvanized the group.
These good people were planning
to skip school to show support at
the October 29 Board meeting.
They were bringing students and
teachers to testify in his favor.
“I was… flabbergasted. I didn’t
have the heart to even make the
roll call. By the time they got to
‘anyone else?’ I was too intimidated
and overwhelmed to say, ‘Here.’
I didn’t know what affiliation to claim.
“Long story short, these folks made
a huge showing outside the morning
Board meeting, while 35,000 union
members were busy serving the
needs of our youth.
“It was a much needed wake-up call.
“I began to realize the extent of the
ignorance and hubris that fuels many
ed-reform decisions, as well as the
extent of my own ignorance. The
addition of businessmen and
socialites to a board I sat on made
sense suddenly, as did their
posturing and pronouncements.
“If you’ve ever heard people mis-
speaking about things you know
intimately, or talking about you when
they thought you weren’t listening,
you know how pained I was and still
am. I couldn’t speak then and have
just found the words, now.
“Some of the groups in the pro-Deasy
rally – Students First, Green Dot,
KIPP LA – were to be expected,
although they have no business in
LAUSD’s superintendent evaluation.
“Others made me gag in wonder –
Goodwill of Southern California?
Inner-City Struggle? LA Education
Partnership? I thought we were
friends!
————————————
One of the key things that turned
off Lisa is that this astroturfers
were engaging in wholesale slander
against UTLA, whose teachers are
contractually forbidden from
attending this rally during school
hours.
————————————
LISA ALVA WOOD:
“They weren’t talking about me,
personally, but they clearly saw
themselves as supporting their
hero, a hero whose arch-enemy
is my union, UTLA. It was, and
is, very difficult to understand
why they need to draw a
protective circle in the sand
around John Deasy. (Speculation
is rampant, but facts are hard to
come by).
“The bottom line for me personally
is that there are too many good
people distracted by too many
superfluous groups. The best
place for an educator to protect
and promote public education is
the teachers’ union. Over time,
for better or for worse, the union
is the educators’ bastion and it
is set up via a democratic
process in which any member
can participate. If UTLA needs
to be more positive and
professional, we need to make
it that way ourselves, but that’s
another story.”
——————–
and on her piece goes…
December 15, 2013 at 5:22 pm
Thank you Jack. Gonna give this a good going over and get back to you.
December 11, 2013 at 7:54 pm
You go Patrick!!! Wish I could be there to hear you speak.
Your cousin, Ellen
December 11, 2013 at 6:08 pm
Thanks for having the guts to publicly say what not many others (myself included) did: This was a destructive use of the race card in order to achieve a political gain.
Terrible