Expect No Change: King Will Be Replaced by a Facsimile Thereof

December 11, 2014
John King:  Builder of airplanes in mid air

John King: Builder of airplanes in mid air

So I woke up this morning to the news that New York State Education Commissioner John King, who never met a reformer he didn’t grovel to or a reform idea, tested or not, that he didn’t want to impose on an entire system, has been booted out or moved up or both, depending on how you look at it or who you read.

At any rate, King is soon to be gone.

Here and there bloggers have written of feelings of joy and the like at King’s departure. For myself, as much as I find the man a complete fraud and utterly reprehensible, King’s departure makes me feel, well… nothing much at all.
Yes, I’ll be glad not to see his can’t -you –see- how –sincere- I am face so much or to hear his whiny arrogant voice but it is near impossible for me to believe that King will be replaced by another better, or even different, than himself.
The news brings to my mind the changing chancellorships in New York City under the wretched reign of Mike Bloomberg: the prosecutional era of former prosecutor Joel Klein, followed by the ephemeral and clueless moment of the preposterous Cathy Black, followed, in turn, by the return of the steady, deadening hand of professional Yes Man Dennis Walcott. Through them all, the only thing that changed was the name of the chancellors and, as the reformers are constantly coming up with new terrible ideas, the methods of undermining the schools, busting the union and stripping the teachers of autonomy and morale.

Nothing changed because, despite their titles, not one of these chancellors was actually in charge. (Under orders to destroy the teachers union by any means possible, Klein may have come up with a few of his own ideas, but Black and Walcott? No way. ) Principally they came from Bloomberg but also indirectly from people like Bill Gates and Eli Broad, to say nothing of the ever expanding Wall St and hedge contingent of education experts. All of these nominal chancellors were taking their orders from others in ways that mocked they very idea that these were civil servants, mocked even more the idea that they were beholden to the people they served.
Not one of those chancellors was in charge and neither was King.

King, who spent two or three years in a classroom before becoming a charter school entrepreneur, was catapulted to the status of state commissioner because those who catapulted him understood that herein was a man who could be trusted to obey orders.
And obey orders King did.
As far as I can see, no campaign ( it is NOT a movement ) has so cynically exploited the nightmare of America’s racism as has the billionaire based education reform campaign, so the fact that King was completely malleable and African American made him the perfect choice of the ed reformers who declared ( and declare and declare ) that “education is the civil rights issue of our time.” Accordingly, King was the perfect Manchurian Commissioner. Perfect, that is, for a year or two while King enjoyed the luxury of seldom having to actually face the public he ostensibly served and consistently betrayed.

All this changed in the wake of the Common Core debacle in which, as King predicted, some 70% of New York students failed the new whiz bang tests and parents were increasingly horrified and disgusted at what was happening to their kids and their kids’ teachers under the miraculous new Common Core regime.

Rebellion was in the air, and somebody somewhere thought it would be a good idea if the seemingly mild mannered King went to a few choice locations throughout the state to enlighten and lecture the huddled masses yearning to be free as to the miraculous powers of the Common Core, a power that King, like virtually all education reformers, mysteriously withholds from his own children.

But, to King’s surprise, the masses – which is to say, the parents of the children in King’ s charge and the teachers who were teaching them — were in no mood for a lecture. King’s towering arrogance and thinly disguised contempt toward both parents and teachers, his rote arguments based on nothing but stale crème puffs and his anger at being obliged to actually answer questions was not, as they say, well received.
The Traveling King show was abruptly cancelled to allow its star a prolonged pouting fit, only to be revived for two performances in New York City along with guest star Meryl Tisch. The Brooklyn show, disgracefully stage-managed by operatives of Michelle Rhee’s front StudentsFirst who were allowed into the venue an hour early, swined up all but a few speaking spots and, generally speaking, treated King’s appearance as if he was making a monumental sacrifice simply deigning to be there among them.

King’s act was wearing thin and King became a liability for the people who orchestrated his meteoric rise to power. Like Cathy Black, King’s problems were
not because of his policies which he steadfastly and robotically defended, but because of public relations, far and away the dominant force behind a decade of so called “education reform. ”

King never rebounded.

That may be one reason that King, whether through his own volition or not, is gone. Who knows?
To me, only three things are certain. The first is that, in return for his service to them, John King will continue to reside on Easy Street for the rest of his mortal life. His billionaire friends will see to that.
The second is that whoever is named to replace King will, in terms of policy, in no meaningful way differ from King. Like the chancellors under Bloomberg, only the face will change.

Such is the oligarchic way.

The third is that, barring a miracle or a catastrophe, the destruction of public education in the state of New York will continue unabated and, in light of Andrew Cuomo’s remarkable promise to “break the last monopoly,” likely even accelerate.

That too is the way of oligarchy.

6 Responses to “Expect No Change: King Will Be Replaced by a Facsimile Thereof”

  1. Reformers falling apart Says:

    The reformers are falling apart. Their only hope is using the press for their ill fated bull shit bogus propaganda. Once charters need to open up and play by the real books, they will be exposed for what they are…..schools without special education students, schools without esl students. schools without thugs from rikers island….so watch as their ideas come tumbling down and do not think of these terds as anything else of what they actually are

  2. Michael Fiorillo Says:

    Great post by Patrick, and great comments by Michele and Haris.

  3. Michele Hamilton Says:

    Great piece Patrick. I actually don’t feel good about him leaving – at least we knew what we were dealing with. The next one to come is sure to be worse.
    And Harris I agree that we have to ally ourselves with parents. But that is no easy task because people do see it as a choice btw a public school and a charter. Parents want their best for their kids and they are really not concerned with the big picture of charters chipping away at the public school system and ruining every other kid’s chance at a decent education. I have gotten into many arguments with parents over this. Parents who cannot get their kids into Pre-K or Kindergarten so send their kid to Eva’s Success Academy in Cobble Hill, parents who buy brownstones in gentrifying neighborhoods and send their kids to Community Roots (not a corporate charter) or Brooklyn Prospect which has now opened an elementary school in district 13 to feed into their 6-12 school in district 15 . These parents can now breathe easier – they got little Johnny into a good school and can later avoid the Hunger Games that is the NYC Middle School and High School application process AND they can get little Johnny’s brother and/or sister in too because charters have a sibling policy – something that middle and high schools do NOT have. The system is a competitive one and the middle class parents are set for the challenge and usually end up on the winning end but if not, they can opt out – private/religious/charter or move out of the city. The working class is stuck and see charter schools as the answer. Parents are beginning to understand that, by design, our schools are severely underfunded but feel powerless to do anything about it.

    • patrickwalsh Says:

      Your points are not only valid but chillingly so. I’ve been trying to finish a piece addressing them for a while now but…time. Thank you for your kind words, Michelle, and keep the faith. Sometimes it’s all we got.

  4. Harris L. Says:

    Yes, as always, spot on, Patrick.

    I allowed myself twenty-four hours to rejoice at the spectacle of Andrew Cuomo handing his headache over to Barack Obama and Arne Duncan to handle for a few years while Mr. King negotiates his somersault into Pearson or Scholastic or EduFoundation World.

    But we will get much worse because the Regents and the governor have unburdened themselves of a hack and are going to find someone with the intelligence, resourcefulness and gravitas to drive home a reformista program that will have our eyes spin back in our heads.

    This sounds defeatist. I mean to sound realistic. I am, perhaps, the most pragmatic idealist among my comrades. I know why I fight but I try to be as clear-eyed as I can about the fight we now engage.

    We are guerillas in a war against well-resourced adversaries. We need to stop and rethink our strategy in light of a rapidly changing environment. It will be impossible to win our fight only with another online petitions, more “campaigns” that have no focus and leadership and one more resolution at the DA, where we congratulate ourselves for the 500th name or the show of hands that was, maybe, larger this month than last.

    We must build stronger ties to our natural allies: parents, community organizations and enlightened students who have awakened to their peril.

    We cannot continue blindly to defend “public education” without explaining to the larger public exactly how we will change our schools in a way that improves the learning in them.

    I am done with preaching to the choir. I am done with meetings where I debate with other people who share my outrage and anxiety but who want to argue the finer points of philosophy while teachers and students in our schools are sacrificed to the reformistas. I am done with placating our own union masters to defend us.

    Get up.


    Put everything on the table fearlessly and decide whether it might work.

    Find a way to show the teacher in Soundview and Corona and Canarsie who has never once heard of a Delegate Assembly that he or she has an alternative to capitulation and despair.

    Defend our cause in public in ways that a parent who thinks he or she must “choose” between a community school or a charter school for a 10 year old son or daughter can hear and understand.

    Do not assume that because you think the cause is “righteous” or “self-evident” that anyone else will. I assure you that they will not.

    We do not have much time. We have made strides on various fronts but our adversaries count on the fact that we cannot mobilize our natural constituencies. We will show them that we can or we will perish.

    • patrickwalsh Says:

      Beautifully and brilliantly said, Harris. Thank you. I agree with every point — especially the last. Keep the faith!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: