Posts Tagged ‘plutocracy’

The Triumph of Plutocracy: How Bill Gates Dictates American Educational Policy

August 28, 2013

Randi and Bill: Weingarten personally invited Bill Gates to be the keynote speaker at a national AFT Convention in an effort to promote “dialogue.” Bill. however, had come to co-opt the union. He did.

Gates and Randi

In a brilliant post that hopefully will be read from coast to coast, Mercedes Schneider provides evidence to what many suspected or even knew but could not prove: to wit, that the deceitfully named Common Core States Standards Initiative has been almost entirely funded by Bill Gates, including its promotion and implementation. In doing so, Schneider revels much more.

All of it is appalling and extremely disturbing in what it reveals about who is running our school system.

By exposing the role Gate’s money played in virtually every aspect of the immense project, Schneider exposes the two institutionalized lies at the heart of Common Core promotion: the first is that the Common Core is “state led ” rather than “Gates led” ( as Ms. Schneider put it) : the second is that the Common Core was created by teachers rather than education industrialists and entrepreneurs like David Coleman. (Revealingly, despite being considered ” the architect” of the project, Coleman’s name is absent from the CCSI website. )

Schneider’s post is an astounding and chilling document in so far as it shows how the cooperation of virtually every educational organization of note and influence in America has been co-opted by money from Gates’s limitless bank account. It shows, that is, a betrayal of trust of an astounding depth. How many parents across America know, for example, that the National Congress of Parents and Teachers were given a gift of $499,962 by the Gates’ Foundation? How many believe that a person like Gates “gives” anything without demanding much more in return ?
For teachers, the cruelest blows are the $5,400,000 accepted by American Federation of Teachers and the $3.9 million accepted by the National Education Association. This is beyond grotesque. Such “gifts” expose for all to see the moral rot at the leadership levels of our unions. It shows us that we have been, at best, orphaned if not out right betrayed by the very institutions that exist to protect us – that we pay to protect us. It shows us how desperately we need new leadership.

Common Core State Standards and the intrinsically connected high stakes testing and the intrinsically connected Value Added Measures are now the central nervous system of our public schools. That this is almost entirely the work of a private citizen who is rich enough and ruthless enough to impose his will on an entire nation wholly outside of the legislative apparatus in which we base our democracy should send chills down the spine of every American who believes in political freedom. Gates and his enablers — who are just as culpable — mock our democracy with the smiling acceptance of every dime and the spouting of every lie.
Such an attack on basic democratic principles is ignored or accepted at grave risk.

Nation at Risk, the Ur-document of education reform was published in 1983. It’ most often repeated line was the following: “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war. “
The “mediocre educational performance “ was bombast then and is bombast now and has been proven to be ideologically based.
But allow me to paraphrase the sentence in light of Schneider’s information: “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the plutocracy that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war. “

It is an act of war: class war. And it should be viewed as such and reacted to as such.

Schneider’s post is potentially explosive. It is a document that should be read and studied by every teacher, every parent, every concerned citizen and every high school student in America. We have the right to know who is undermining our democratic processes and who is helping them to do so. We have the obligation to expose them and stop them before it is too late.

Thank you, Mercedes Schneider, for your noble and brilliant work.

Mike Bloomberg’s Unwitting Gift

November 2, 2009

Mike Bloomberg’s Unwitting Gift

Having never met the man I cannot say for sure but I can only imagine that a businessman as cunning and ruthless and efficient as Mike Bloomberg seldom if ever makes a move without believing he can extract infinitely more of what ever it is he’s dealing with than what he’s put into it. One does not, after all, become the richest man in New York without, among other things, the gift of calculation to an extraordinary degree. One does not insidiously and with almost military precision and speed eviscerate  the votes of millions of New Yorkers in two referendums without Machiavellian manipulation and   calculation of a lazer-like  intensity and brutal ruthlessness.

So what exactly did Bloomberg calculate and what conclusion did he reach? Let’s be blunt:  Mike Bloomberg calculated (with the assistance of his ever active polling army) that he could, in effect, strip every eligible voter in New York of their constitutional rights, undermine the democratic process itself, insult the intelligence and tempt the integrity of the entire city and somehow you, I and everyone else would simply go along with it.  Or we would somehow forget it by the time the election came along. Or we would be hypnotized by Bloomberg’s ceaseless and omnipotent ads.   Or  maybe  we would just place it in parenthesis while  pondering  Mike Bloomberg’s monumental mayoral achievements without which the city would have sunk into eternal perdition.

What have we here?

What we have here is contempt for the people of New York and the democratic process on a level and to a degree that is nothing short of breathtaking.   “He did what?, ” I recall  people  exclaiming in utter disbelief the  day of his coup.  “How is that possible?” This was the question heard in households all over the city, save, perhaps in the 50 or 60 households of the   people who orchestrated the coup. Nobody knew.  We only knew it had happened.

The act was unprecedented  — not unlike and not unrelated to the problem poised by Bloomberg himself; that of a man with seemingly limitless political ambitions, little if any political integrity —  who solely because of his absurd wealth — posesses the ability and the inclination to strike fear into and demand compliance  even from those usually lording it over others.  Consider the behavior of the editors of the N Y  Times, the Daily News and the Post in the term limits affair.  Here were three men who dismissed Rudy Guliani’s similar attempt to retain his power, albeit for  weeks,  not an entire term, in the tone of  correcting a wayward child.  And this, mind you,  during the midst of Rudy-Mania, when “America’s Mayor ”  seemed to many to be the greatest man in the history of the sperm cell.

No such tone for Mike.  No.  New York needs Mike.  His  steady hand.  His wisdom.  His independence.  His finanical acumen to see us through these tough times.

And other breathless, obsequious  almost Hallmark level nonsense.

Reading  the absurd and contemptuous words of his devotees had led me to   believe   that Mike Bloomberg’s immense wealth, far from keeping him above  “special interests” , has allowed him to become   the most corrupting force in City Hall since the days of Jimmy Walker and before  that ,Tammany Hall.  Yes, it is a most casual and accepted corruption, far more subtle than that of Boss Tweed  —  but it is corruption none the less.  Bloomberg is  not on the take.  Bloomberg corrupts. Bloomberg tries to  put you on the take.   He  simply purchases who and what he  wants — political parties, City Councils,  ministers, elections, what have you.     In this kind of  corruption it matters not at all that Bloomberg himself  never dirties his hands.  He needn’t do so.  Others dirty their hands for him.  Consider  Calvin O. Butts, minister of the historic Abyssinain Baptist Church in Harlem and perhaps the most influencial African-American minister in the city.  Butts is supporting Mike  Bloomberg.  According to the New York Times, Bloomberg’s rival,  Mr. Thompson was reportededly furious at what he considered Butt’s  betrayal. ” But what he did not know,”  said the Times  “was that Mr. Bloomberg gave a $1 million donation to the church’s development corporation — roughly 10 percent of its annual budget — with the implicit promise of more to come. “What could I say to a man who was mayor, and was supportive of a lot of programs that are important to me?” Mr. Butts said in an interview before he endorsed Mr. Bloomberg.”  ‘

You could say, Pastor Butts,  that I’m not for sale, no ?  Can you not ?  Sadly, the scenario with Butts has repeated itself in city wide.

This is corruption.  Who other than Bloomberg has a million dollars to hand out willy nilly?  What, other than the basest form of  self interest — Bloomberg’s as well as whoever it is he  is  purchasing  —  is being appealed to and  manipulated here?

But most of all what we have here is a man with   essentially limitless capital and utter contempt for the democratic process and hence the rights of all others.   If ever a man embodied Justice Louis D. Brandeis’s dictum about democracy and wealth – “We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can’t have both, — ”  it is Mike Bloomberg.

Bloomberg’s  shameless act was possible for one reason and one reason only: his  tremendous,  even insane wealth allows him to corrupt everyone who is corruptible until he gets what he wants. Indeed, this election is  nothing short of Bloomger’s attempt to corrupt an entire city.  Sure Mike, it’s OK to over turn millions of votes.   Anything is OK as long as Mike  gets  what Mike wants.  And what Mike wants is power, laws and the will of the people be damned.

Let us be clear.  You can rationalize and explain and excuse what Bloomberg did for rest of time — and you can rest assured, Bloomberg has already hired people, ivy league  educated people to be sure, to, as much as humanly possibly, do exactly that. And you can rest assured he pays them very well.

But, if you truly believe in   democracy what you cannot possibly do under any circumstances is justify Bloomberg’s act.  There is simply no getting around it:  Bloomberg undermined the    democratic process and people who believe in democracy neither do such nor accept such. Perhaps the presidency of  George W. Bush, which  began with its own undermining   of  democracy when the Supreme Court stepped in to  declare Bush the victor allowing the man to spend the  next eight years dismantling the constituion and Bill of Rights has subtly  eroded our sense of  belief to a place where repulsive acts like Bloomberg’s are somehow acceptable.  I hope and pray not.  But  consider the rage, the rightful rage that swelled in this  nation as the revelations of the Watergate scandal came to  light. And what was Watergate but the attempt  to undermine  of the democratic process ?  Yes, the stakes were infinitely higher and, yes, the procedure was different but the difference is in style and not in substance.   Both were intended to undermine the democratic process. The difference is  that Nixon failed where Bloomberg succeeded.  As yet anyway.  And while it is true that Bloomberg   did not actually hire a gang of CIA sleazebags to get his way, it’s also true that he did not have to.     Why should he when he can simply buy 29 sleazy members of our City Council led by disgraceful speaker Christine Quinn herself to steal your vote before you even knew what happened ?

Boom.

Done deal.

Next.

Nixon’s tawdry maneuver cost him the   presidency.  Bloomberg is hoping   that his slimy move will position him for the White House.

It may well  do that, but, for the moment it provides an opportunity for New Yorkers to rise to what Lincoln called “the better angels of  our nature.  ” In a sense, in a very  real sense this  election is  not about Mike Bloomberg and Bill Thompson at all.  From his eight years at City Hall anyone with eyes to see knows Mike Bloomberg. Every one in education, for one,  knows that his much vaunted reforms are a sham and that Bloomberg is the Bernie Madoff of test scores.  What sane man would place a half psychotic former federal prosecutor like Joel Klein in charge of the largest school system in the nation ?  But it does not matter if Mile Bloomberg was the greatest mayor in the  history  of the city  instead of the mediocrity that he is.  The man does not believe in democracy. The man believes he is a law unto himself.  The man holds us all in contempt.

Anyone who’s kept on eye on things in New York knows  Bill Thompson as well.   Bill Thompson is a decent and honorable man who is a true public servant.   I  have no doubt  that he would make a fine  mayor and I will have no trouble pulling the lever for him come Tuesday. Indeed, I will do so happily.

But this election is  bigger than these two men.

It is about plutocracy as opposed to   democracy. It’s  about the will of the people as opposed to the will of  an arrogant narcissistic billionaire mediocrity. It is  about deciding, as the  old  union  anthem went, “Which Side Are You On?”  There is no middle ground.  Not here.  Not now.

It provides New Yorkers with an opportunity to tell the Michael Bloomberg’s of the world and the rest of the nation  that we shall not be bought and our rights  are not for sale, Christine Quinn and Co. be dammed.    Above all it provides New Yorkers with a moment to affirm their belief in the sacredness of the democratic process and the will of the people.

These opportunities are Mike Bloomberg’s unwitting gift and seen clearly they are as  monumental a gift  as the arrogance that birthed it.  He  has calculated that we are too foolish, dumb, broken or   in awe of his magisterial powers to use it.

Let us hope we have the courage and the faith, in ourselves and in the democratic  system, to use it — for if we do not we are accepting and deserving of contempt.

And we will receive it.