Archive for October, 2012

The Wrath of Sandy

October 31, 2012

No street lights.

 

A dangling crane.

Trees.

Scary. Very scary.

 

No phone.  No hot water. No music. No lights.   No food.  No heat.  No coffee.

No electricity.

This blog is sent to you from a sidewalk in front of Starbucks where I am peaching on their WiFi as there are so many people in there you can not get in the place .

Cycling 40 blocks for a cup of coffee.  No fun.

And at least  four more days of the same.

The sole consolation: it is quiet.  Very, very quiet.  18th century quiet.

The following images were taken the morning after in various parts of the city as I made my way up town in search of coffee and food, in that order.

Silence

damage

The empty FDR Drive.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

12 Hours Later: NYC Awaiting Hurricane Sandy at 9:30 am

October 29, 2012

It is the absence and the quiet that is so strange.  The almost silence amidst the dog walkers and coffee drinkers, beneath the drizzling ominous sky and, every by and by,  a push-me-across- the street gust of wind.

Houston Street

Lenin atop Red Square and an Ominous Sky

Marble Cemetery: the dead are not concerned.

With man’s best friend.

Silent Second Ave

Grey sky

No school crossing today

She comes. 

Katz’s Deli Fears Not Sandy.

Ludlow Street void of hipsters.

New York Awaits Hurricane Sandy: Scenes from an Anxious City

October 28, 2012

  Empty streets.  Closed parks.  Silent Subways.  Packed bars.

George McGovern: “The Most Decent Man in the Unites States Senate.”

October 22, 2012

Of George McGovern Senator Robert Kennedy once said, “ He is the most decent man in the United States Senate.  Perhaps the only decent man in the United States Senate.”   After his disastrous 1972 presidential campaign such decency helped propel McGovern into a political punch line for decades but the joke, ultimately was on us:  instead of a man who would have ended the Vietnam war in a week, we got Nixon who prolonged it for years resulting in the pointless slaughter of thousands  more  American  soldiers and many more thousands of Vietnamese men, women and children.   Instead of intelligent liberalism, we got Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton and Bush  father and son culminating in a steady  Right ward  drift so pronounced  that Richard Nixon would be to the Left of   both Obama and Romney on almost all major issues. And Nixon was no liberal.  Indeed, after McGovern’s run we slowly slipped into such a state of  political and intellectual depravity  that the very words  “liberal”  and “liberalism”   — words that describe the very political tradition and foundation on which the nation was formed — became,   in many circles, the worst kind of put down — a political trajectory that has led many a former blue collar liberal down the suicidal yellow brick road of the Tea Party.

But not for George McGovern who knew of what he spoke and cared about what he saw happening to his country and his compatriots.

Until and unless men and women of the integrity and decency of McGovern  can not merely obtain office but hold real sway in the American political landscape – seemingly impossible in an age of oligarchy and corporate domination of everything – we are doomed to shills like Romney and Obama ever deepening oligarchy and corporate domination of everything.  And we doom ourselves.

Rest in peace, Senator McGovern.  You did your bit and you did it nobly and fearlessly.   You kept the flame in a time of ever deepening darkness. You fought the good fight.

Now it is our turn.

Austerity and Accountability for Thee But Not for Me

October 15, 2012

One can hardly be within earshot of any babbling politician anywhere in the US these days without hearing about the need for accountability and austerity, austerity and accountability. This goes double  — at least ! — if said babbler is babbling about education  which is likely as the  weeping and gnashing of teeth over the sheer lousiness of public school teachers  has become a  national pastime greater than baseball and is infinitely easier to play.

Now there is nothing necessarily wrong with talking about austerity and accountability if it is implemented in a sane fashion and shared across the board.  But, when it comes to education, at any rate, how exactly is this accountability and austerity stuff played out? Well, for the austerity part you simply slash budgets left and right, regardless if said slashing results in elephantine class sizes, vanishing music, art, and gym   classes, and legions of teachers buying pencils, notebooks and what have you for their students.   Rather more furtively you undermine teacher’s pensions and health care, target   teachers with experience and hence higher salaries and systemically create conditions that are so demoralizing and degrading many people simply quit after a couple of years.   This kind of thing is absolutely guaranteed to keep the ship a bit more austere.

The accountability angle is even simpler.  In fact, one might say it is simple minded.      For about a decade now the idiotic idea of applying the principles of business to the art of teaching has been allowed to run roughshod over just about the entire United States. This has led to the absurd if revealing situation in which the language of education and the language of business are in many cases interchangeable, even if the change only went one way. That is to say while I have yet to hear of any businessman speaking of, say, “disjunctive conjunctions” or “pathos” I have been forced to listen to rivers of crazy and reckless blather (all somehow delivered with a straight face ) concerning a teacher’s  “value -added”  “metrics” and the like all built around the apotheosis of the standardized test. In fact, more standardized tests than have ever been seen before or even imagined on planet earth. And there is more to come.  More  and more and more.     It remains to be seen what, if any,  positive changes will come of the ceaseless testing of our children, at least as opposed to the certainty of the billions that will be made by test makers and text book publishers, all certain to be revised every year or so to insure even more billions and all courtesy of the public dime.

No austerity there, thank you very much.

I, for one, predict that the cultural illiteracy that allowed this testing mania to take hold will merely deepen.  How can it not?    I also believe it will be produce millions of test drunk graduates who will be shocked to discover that the vagaries of life bear zero relationship to a standardized test.  How could they be otherwise ?

For the time being, however, it’s the teacher’s turn to be shocked:  First by the viciousness and relentlessness of their billionaire backed attackers and then by the ease in which a handful of billionaires have pushed around our elected officials  — up to and including the president of the United States — like they were so many balloons, forcing their ignorant will upon an entire nation of children and their teachers, come what may. Let us put aside, for the moment, the outrageous truth about the tests that are increasingly used to evaluate public schools and public school teachers: put aside the fact that they have no scientific merit whatsoever. None. Zero. Zip.   Put aside the fact that the very people who created them have stated explicitly and repeatedly that they were not designed to evaluate teachers and should not be used to evaluate teachers.  Today, in more and more of the country the teachers are judged “effective “ or  “ ineffective”’ largely by the test scores of their students.

Let us consider the consequences of receiving such an  evaluation.

When a public school teacher is judged incompetent and fired, unlike say a bank employee or a Wall  Street  hustler, they cannot simply walk down the street and  apply to the school a few blocks down.    They are stripped of their licenses, and with their license, their livelihood.   This is bad.  Very, very bad. And if you are going to do it, if you are going to strip  a person of their ability to support themselves and their families,  you had better have some damned good reasons to do so and they’d better be more than hopelessly flawed tests scores.    I have seen this horrible and humiliating process play out with three fine teachers whom I had the privilege to work with.   Indeed, two years later it is still playing out as two of them are still searching for work and one recently had to leave the country to land a job.

And with them you have austerity and accountability in one big disgusting bang.

.

Which brings us to the curious case of peripatetic twice failed school chancellor Jean Claude Brizard, late of Rochester and more recently Chicago who seems, like so many people of power and authority, somehow immune to the pitiless eye of both  austerity and accountability that has caused so many so much pain and misery. In fact, Brizard’s situation seems to  mock it.

Consider the following from  chicagotribune.com:

Departing Brizard to get full year’s salary

By John Byrne

Clout Street

12:12 PM CDT, October 12, 2012

Departing Chicago Public Schools CEO Jean-Claude Brizard will get a full year’s salary as part of his severance package, district officials said today.

The school board gave Brizard a two-year contract at $250,000 a year when it hired him in April 2011. The contract was set to expire next May.

A severance package of a full year’s salary seems peculiar enough in the best of times but in an age of austerity?  And it is that much more peculiar when, as the  paragraph below seems to indicate, Brizard,  in fact, quit.

Brizard approached Chicago Board of Education President David Vitale about stepping down.”

Is it customary to receive severance package when you quit your job ?  Will I get one if I quit mine ?   A full year’s salary?   Or is this extraordinary arrangement reserved only for those who wander from city to city furthering the deliberate destruction of the public  school system, paying fealty to their corporate overlords  while preaching from  their perches of fleeting power the eternal gospel of accountability  and austerity for the little people ?